Supreme Court Aadhaar Ruling for Electoral Rolls in Bihar

The Supreme Court of India has ordered the Election Commission to accept the Aadhaar card as the 12th document for identity verification during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar.

Why This Matters

Voter participation and electoral integrity are core democratic issues, resonating with citizens and generating significant social media discourse.

Public Sentiment Summary

Public sentiment is predominantly negative and reflects deep-seated concerns about the Supreme Court's ruling that permits Aadhaar as a valid document for voter identity in Bihar. Commenters worry about the distinction between identity and citizenship, fearing misuse by illegal immigrants and non-citizens, and express distrust towards the Election Commission regarding the integrity of the electoral process. While some see potential benefits in voter participation and combating illegal voting, the overall mood is one of skepticism and a demand for greater electoral reform and accountability.

Highlighted Comments

Aadhar is a valid Proof of Identity for verification of VOTER LIST. But, Aadhar is not a proof of CITIZENSHIP.

Even illegal immigrants with fake Aadhar Cards can vote. If Aadhar is not a proof for citizenship, inclusion of a person in the voter list on the basis of Aadhar looks rather awkward.

We can't trust the aadhar card as well. Because even illegal citizens are having one.

How can Aadhar be validated... what supreme court doing

You are right on spot. The present ruling party will retain power for another half a century if this is allowed to go on.

Parties Involved

  • Supreme Court
  • Election Commission
  • Government of Bihar

What the people want

Supreme Court: Please reconsider the implications of your ruling on Aadhaar and its impact on citizenship verification.

Election Commission: There is a pressing need for transparency and rigorous verification processes to maintain electoral integrity.

Government of Bihar: Address the public's concerns seriously and facilitate reforms to protect the democratic process.